Exist and Resist . Indigenize and Decolonize

Cultural Appropriation
Cultural Appropriation

I write this blog post from the understanding that I, as a visitor from Northern Ireland am sitting on the occupied and stolen land of the Anishinaabe peoples, Haudenosaunee. This article I will write about was written by Âpihtawikosisân (2012), a Métis from the Plains Cree speaking community of Lac Ste. Anne, Alberta. ‘An Open Letter to Non-Natives in Headdresses’ looks at the issue of cultural appropriation, specifically looking at the ‘hipster’ trend of headdresses (otherwise known as war bonnets) at festivals such as Coachella and Burning man (Adrienne 2012)


The article looks at cultural appropriation through restricted symbols and unrestricted symbols. Showing that some symbols have an allegorical meaning attached to them, that they represent aspects of culture that have been earned. For example, war bonnets, the impressive feather headdresses commonly seen in western movies, are typically only worn by the Sioux, Crow, Blackfeet , Cheyenne and Plains Cree, from the Great plains region and only worn by chiefs and warriors (Âpihtawikosisân 2012).

Cultural appropriation is when someone or a group takes someone else’s practice without permission and makes it their own without knowing the correct meaning. Instead of appropriating native culture, try to celebrate it instead, in ways that does not add to negative stereotyping and commodification of culture.(Link in references on how to do this) She understands that people make mistakes and may not know that something is not respective (âpihtawikosisân 2012).

A question that often arises in online discussions is often similar or identical to this one “[T]here are plenty of Native-American descended Hispanics that love White people stuff and European stuff, so why can’t White people like Native stuff too?”(Lever 2011)


Firstly one cannot appropriate the dominant, especially if the ‘supposed’ appropriation was non- consensually forced upon a whole culture. There is a power imbalance that involves years of violence and an oppressive colonial history (Mycultureisnotatrend 2014) Cultural appropriation is another negative outcome of imperialism, capitalism, oppression and assimilation.  Imperialism is the creation and maintenance of an unequal cultural, economic and territorial relationship, based on domination and subordination, designed to pillage people and lands. Thus under capitalist imperialism, culture is seen as a resource commodity, ready to be stolen and sold on the market (Unsettling America 2011).

Secondly it ignores the forced assimilation practices that colonizers enforced upon indigenous peoples. Claiming indigenous peoples were savage and uncivilized, sanctioning the settlers to rationalize their actions in the name of civilization and Christianity. The theme of assimilation defined a framework for solving “the Indian problem” “the great aim of our civilization has been to do away with the tribal system and assimilate the Indian people in all respects with the inhabitants of the dominion, as speedily as they are fit for the change” (Sir John a McDonald as cited in Flearas Pp196) Cultural appropriation speeds up this process, because it is profitable, a marginalized culture can become lost, cultural identities can be blended into the dominate culture and then exploited for profit.

black and tan

On top of this cultural appropriation is the extension of racism, genocide and oppression. The headdress and other cultural appropriations could be seen as settlers mocking their victims by mimicking them through tried and practiced cultural production of stereotypes that were used to dehumanize indigenous peoples, making the public support their deaths and turn a blind eye to their continued suffering. Similar to the name of a drink ‘ black and tan’ that is consumed in North America. It is named after the uniform of the Royal Irish Constabulary, which were part of the escalation of violence, civilian attacks, police militarization and brutality in Ireland in 1920 (Northern Ireland is still occupied today and still in conflict) (Lowe.W.J 2015 and Michael 2014)

These comments ignore the colonial history and imperial rule that carved native history into the traumatized cultural genocide of an entire continent to the imposition of residential schools, creation and implication of systemic and institutional racism, stolen generations, and the eradication of entire groups of people and their cultural traditions. Ignoring the interconnectivity of race, class, and gender and their ability to produce and perpetuate systems of oppression and domination (Hooks 1984).


They ignore the fact that there are hundreds of missing and murdered Indigenous women whose cases have never even been looked at. Indigenous women are far more likely than non-Indigenous women to experience violence. In a 2009 a Canadian government survey of the ten provinces, indigenous women were nearly three times more likely than non-indigenous  women to report being a victim of a violent crime. A report released in May 2014 states that 1,017 Indigenous women and girls were murdered from 1980-2012. Because of gaps in police and government reporting, the actual numbers may be much higher (Amnesty 2014).

Canada prides its self on being a ‘multicultural mosaichowever it seems to ignore the fact that a large proportion of the indigenous population are in the substratum of the socioeconomic hierarchy. Canadian society is structurally based on the fundamental inequality between the settler and the indigenous. It is important to analyze the disparities in relation to the patterns of power between privilege and property. As long as these predominantly unequal intragroup relations continue to prevail and provoke the politics of race, ethnicity and indigenous relations will remain a contested subject (Fleras 2012).

exist, resist, indigenize and decolonize

Indigenous activists are focused on decolonization, which is as much a process as it is a goal (Walia 2012) which could start with ‘[A] dramatic reimagining of relationships with land, people and the state. Much of this requires study. It requires conversation (for example; with people wearing headdresses). It is a practice; it is an unlearning.” (Hussan cited in Walia 2012)

idel no more allyship

Stephanie Irlbacher-Fox (2012) from Idle no more suggests that “co-existence through co-resistance” is the responsibility of settlers, following and supporting Indigenous action and direction. For settler allies, having a place to land relationally creates a stronger rationale for unsettling established systems. This kind of relationship creates accountability and responsibility for sustained supportive action.


Âpihtawikosisân.” An open Letter to Non- Natives in Headdresses”. Âpihtawikosisân, Law      Language, Life: a plains Cree speaking Metis women in Montreal. , 2012. Web. Sunday 1March 2015. Retrieved from http://apihtawikosisan.com/hall-of-shame/an-open-letter-to-non-natives-in-headdresses/

Fleras, Augie. “Unequal relations: An introduction to Race, Ethnic, and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada” Don Mills: Person Canada. 2012

Harsha, Walia “Decolonizing Together: Moving Beyond a Politics of Solidarity toward a Practice of Decolonization”. , Briar Patch Magazine: Fiercely Independent. 20. Web March 1, 2015. Retrieved from http://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/decolonizing-together

Hooks, Bell. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Centre. Cambridge MA: South End Press, 1984.Print

Irlbacher-Fox. Stephanie. “#IdleNoMore: Settler Responsibility for relationship”. Decolonization indigeneity, education and society. , September 16, 2011. Web. Tuesday 03, 2015. Retrieved from https://decolonization.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/idlenomore-settler responsibility-for-relationship/

K, Adrienne. “The Hipster Headdress Abounds at Coachella”. Native Appropriations. 2012 Available at http://nativeappropriations.com/2010/04/the-hipster-headdress-abounds-`atcoachella.html accessed on 01 March 2015

Lever “Is it disrespectful to get a tattoo of a Native American”. , Yahoo Answers. 2011. Web March 1, 2015. Retrieved from https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110412141428AAwISW2

Lowe. W.J “Who Were the Black and Tans”. , History Ireland.2015. Web. March 12 2015. Retrieved from http://www.historyireland.com/20th-century-contemporary-history/who-were-the-black-and-tans/

Michael. “How not to get tossed out of a pub in Ireland”. Changes in Longitude. Web. March 8 2014. Retrieved from http://www.changesinlongitude.com/order-black-and-tan-irish-pub-ireland-dublin/

My Culture is Not a Trend “My Culture is Not a Trend: A Dialogue about Cultural Appropriation”. 2012. Web. March 1 2015 http://mycultureisnotatrend.tumblr.com/

Native Languges. “Native Headdresses: Facts for Kids”. , Native Languages of Americas Website. 1998-2015. March 3 2015. Retreived from http://www.nativelanguages.org/headdresses.htm

Unsettling America. “Cultural Appreciation or Cultural Appropriation”. , Unsettling America: Decolonization in Theory and Practice. September 16, 2011. Web. Tuesday 3 March 2015. Retrieved from https://unsettlingamerica.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/cultural-appreciation-or-culturalappropriation/

Exist and Resist . Indigenize and Decolonize

4 thoughts on “Exist and Resist . Indigenize and Decolonize

  1. The way you started your blog post was both intriguing and shocking (a good shocking). I am born in Canada and have lived in the same place for my whole life. Just from your opening statement, it created a sense of guilt and awareness for me, which was important for me to feel to really understand the importance of this issue. Your blog is full of interesting, dense and clearly thought out points. I like that in your third paragraph you explain cultural appropriation and then throughout your blog you connect your points and tie in new ideas.

    In the article, An Open Letter to Non-Natives in Headdresses it explores cultural appropriation. This makes me question the extent that the individuals who are seen at Coachella and Burning Man actually understand the affects that wearing the headdress is creating. Are they aware of cultural appropriation? Do they know they are offending a group of people? Maybe these individuals are completely clueless and there needs to be more awareness created for everyone around this issue. In what ways can society develop a greater awareness around this problem and prevent people from offending and disrespecting? Lastly, I liked how you mentioned the vulnerability Indigenous woman experience as well as the lack of multiculturalism Canada really has.

    Overall your blog post was thought provoking and I enjoyed the photos!


  2. First of all, I very much agree with CRAZYEYES5 on the way you started the blog. I was born in a different country and came to Canada to pursue my education later. Prior to entering the country for the very first time, my image of this country is a land filled with white people, as that’s how media portraits the country. Then I came here, learned about the history of this country, and realized the issue with the native people.
    Often than not, people do things without thinking or considering the consequences of their actions. Things probably as little as, for example wearing headdresses, might mean a great deal for other people or culture as it might have significant historical meaning that ties with the particular cultures.
    I think the main take home message here is not that we are not encouraged to wear headdresses or other items from the indigenous cultures, but there is a need to appreciate those things by understanding the meanings that ties with it.
    I think you did a great job on the blog post! It was indeed a very interesting and thought-provoking piece.


  3. piper125 says:

    This was a fantastic read and I am extremely appreciative of the awareness and consciousness you bring to the table in terms of recognizing these lands as stolen and the people as alienated. Many are blissfully ignorant of the colonialism through which these lands have become the way that they are, and what has happened to the original inhabitants of the land as a result. This institutional and systemic marginalization of Aboriginal people are hidden from popular media and discourse, and therefore appalling statistics such as the recent surge of murdered and missing Aboriginal women has gone without much public upheaval. How dare the residents of this nation accuse Aboriginal communities as being inherently “deviant” and “violent” in the wake of these happenings, when it is merely that we have created such abhorrent conditions that make these events unavoidable (i.e. the lack of police presence, lack of education, lack of adequate government support)?

    You touched on some great points in this blog post and it was extremely well written and thought provoking!


  4. redjr21 says:

    This blog was very well done, as it touched upon many important themes that go far deeper than cultural appropriation via clothing choices. Seeing the headdress worn at many music festivals, I feel that those who engage in this kind of cultural appropriation are hardly aware of the disgusting nature of their actions, and simply see their actions as one of fashion and trendiness. The headdress continues to be worn without consequence or call for action; one can see Nicki Minaj wearing a headdress on a poster for her upcoming tour, this occurring just months after the release of her music video inciting imagery of Nazi propaganda. Nicki Minaj is often heralded as a feminist, yet appropriates multiple cultures in horrible ways and without consequence. In addition, I appreciate you discussing how “white culture” cannot be appropriated. This is obvious to one who has an understanding of racism, imperialism and colonialism, but apparently is not to others, and this strengthens your argument.

    I also very much appreciated your stating your positionality before beginning your blog. I think that this is an approach that could always be taken, but it is especially meaningful given the subject of your blog. Despite being Canadian born myself, my family did not immigrate to Canada that long ago, and I am relatively aware of my cultural roots. With that being said, I see how the Canadian government has long tried to suggest they are a multicultural nation, even incorporating multiculturalism into its formal policy in 1971 (and being the only nation with multiculturalism as an actual policy, rather than simply stating they’re multicultural). Despite these attempts, this is far from true. For decades, Canadian policy has been to restrict immigration of certain ethnicities, assimilate others, and culturally exterminate Indigenous cultures. The Canadian government has put forth an incredibly sanitized version of the nation’s history, and Canadians often get a romanticized glimpse of the nation’s affairs. One only need be reminded of the horrific conditions of Attawapiskat to realize the disgusting treatment of Indigenous peoples, as well as the level of deception that that government has succeeded in maintaining.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s